Univerzitet i budućnost humanističkih i društvenih znanosti: Znanost u doba etnopolitike / University and ahe Future of Humanities and Social Sciences: Scienece in the Age of Ethnopolitics

Senadin Lavić

doi:10.48052/19865244.2025.2.189

Authors

Senadin Lavić University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Political Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48052/19865244.2025.2.189

Keywords:

university, science, knowledge, society, Bosnian university, ethnopolitics, European integration

Abstract

The future, university development importance and perspectives are topics that imply strategic thinking about the knowledge concept that would ensure theoretical, cultural and general human orientation in a time of far-reaching life transformations. In the epochal changes that have befallen upon humanity, when it is difficult to follow historic-cultural and scientific-technological processes, it is necessary to preserve the idea of a Bosnian university that would be the backbone of the maintenance and development of Bosnian society and its plurality. Humanities and social sciences within the university have a special place and importance for the social content and conceptual schemes of an era. They cannot be replaced by skills or technical achievements, and therefore it is necessary to preserve and develop their essential mission in the work of the university.

References

Alexander, B. (2020). Academia Next: The Futures of Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Alexander, B. (2024). ‘“The professors are the enemy”: J.D. Vance on higher education’, BryanAlexander.org, 18. juli.

Baofu, P. (2011). The Future of Post-Human Education: A Preface to a New Theory of Teaching and Learning. New York: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Bloom, A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today's Students. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Cassirer, E. (1985). Filozofija simboličkih oblika. Prvi deo – Jezik; Drugi deo – Mitsko mišljenje; Treći deo – Fenomenologija saznanja. Novi Sad: Književna zajednica.

Demirović, A. (2008). ‘Neoliberalismus und Hegemonie’, u: Butterwegge, C., Lösch, B. i Ptak, R. (ur.), Neoliberalismus: Analysen und Alternativen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

Jäger, W. & Schützeichel, R. (ur.) (2008). Universität und Lebenswelt: Festschrift für Heinz Abels. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Kišjuhas, A. (2024). ‘Univerzitet kao neprijatelj’, Autonomija.info. Dostupno na: https://autonomija.info/aleksej-kisjuhas-univerzitet-kao-neprijatelj/

König, R. (n.d.). Vom Wesen der deutschen Universität.

Meier, F. (2009). Die Universität als Akteur: Zum institutionellen Wandel der Hochschulorganisation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Mittelstraß, J. (1998). Die Häuser des Wissens: Wissenschaftstheoretische Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Reichman, H. (2021). ‘The professors are the enemy: Right-wing attacks on academic freedom have real repercussions’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 14. decembar. Dostupno na: https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-professors-are-the-enemy

Smith, B. L. R., Mayer, J. D. & Fritschler, A. L. (2008). Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology in American Universities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Vance, J. D. (2021). Keynote address, Second National Conservatism Conference, Orlando, Florida, 2. novembar. Dostupno na: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FR65Cifnhw&t=45s

Watson, C. E. (2024). Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning. Washington, DC: Stylus Publishing.

Webster, F. (2014). Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge.

Znaniecki, F. (2019). The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.